|
Leading Ideas
Results in Action
Values
People
Contacting us
Action Design® helps individuals and groups
in organizations develop their capability for inquiry, choice, and
action on their most difficult issues. We provide consulting
services and competence building
programs. We support the continuing development of our
alumni in the Action Design community.
And we participate in a network of scholars and practitioners contributing
to knowledge for the conduct of human affairs.
This page provides an overview of our philosophy. You can also
read a history of our partnership,
a short essay on the theoretical
foundation for our practice, a description of what
and how we learned from each other, and a list of recent books
that refer to our work.
Leading Ideas
"How do you know when you have learned something? When you can
produce it in action!" Chris Argyris issued this challenge when
we began working with him at Harvard in 1979. He argued that
systematic failures of implementation in organizations are caused
by how human beings reason and how we are socialized to deal with
each other, and that both can change. "To intervene in social
systems at a high level of competence," he added, "you must become
a researcher on your own practice." We co-authored the book
Action Science with Chris in 1985.
What kind of inquiry in the midst of action can help when we are
stuck, puzzled, or surprised? Donald Schön
conceptualized how master practitioners act in these moments as
reflecting-in-action, turning thought back on action and on the
knowing implicit in action. In noticing how we have been framing
a situation we can see possibilities for reframing, opening creative
options for action. Reflecting-in-action, and especially frame-reflective
conversation, is crucial to making headway on organizational issues
rooted in the clashing frames held and taken for granted by contending
parties.
How can we build relationships that sustain inquiry into difficult
issues? David Kantor has helped us see how human relationships,
both in families and in organizations, have a structure that forms
as individuals interact in their characteristic ways. Relationship
structures can take on a life of their own, leaving us caught in
unproductive patterns. To intervene effectively we must recognize
structures and understand how we enter relationships. And
we must build a model of practice that fits who we are as individuals.
For more on ideas that have shaped our practice, see the essay
"Foundations: Theory
and Practice."
Results in Action
People working to create effective organizations aspire to high standards
of behavior for themselves and others. Becoming able to live
up to these ideals requires the kind of skill practice that is intertwined
with personal development. Action Design’s methods combine this
developmental work with making progress on current tasks. Our
touchstone is, what impact are we having on how people actually conduct
themselves and on their ability to put their ideals and values into
action.
A focus on results leads naturally to questions of measurement.
The dilemma is that the quality of human thought and action is fundamental
to achieving measurable results, but itself defies measurement.
Organizations rely instead on qualitative judgments—is Group X functioning
as it should, is Fred’s behavior creative, disruptive, or irrelevant,
what are people doing or not doing that prevents marketing and engineering
from getting on the same page? Action Design’s methods bring
rigor to the process of forming, discussing, testing, and acting
on judgments.
We ask, "What are you seeing that leads you to make that judgment?"
"When you talk with her, what will you say?" "Here’s one way
we might say it: (illustrates). What are your reactions?"
In other words, we continuously connect talk about action with doing
the action. This creates fast cycles of acting, reflecting,
and acting. It both improves performance and counteracts the
tendency for "talking-about" to become disconnected from actual
doing.
Values
- Search for truth. We build communities of inquiry
capable of sustaining free and open conversation on the most important
issues.
- Compassion. When human beings fall short in practicing
what they espouse, empathize with the difficulty and help to explore
the gap and how to close it.
- Competence. Help people become increasingly able
to bring about results they desire, in such a way that others
can do the same.
- Mutual responsibility, individual accountability.
- Generosity of spirit. Assuming that each of us
tries to do what we believe is right and just, we ask how others
see things that leads them to act as they do.
- Acknowledging paradox, dilemma, contradiction.
To make progress in human affairs we must open our minds to complexity
while retaining the ability to act.
- Confrontability and vulnerability. We all need
help from others in seeing our limits and learning to become who
we wish to be.
- Choice.
People
Action Design is a partnership formed in 1992 by Philip
McArthur, Robert Putnam, and Diana
McLain Smith. Its roots are the learning
and working relationship that began when we were graduate students
at Harvard University during the 1980’s. Action Design offers
public programs (the Action Design Institute), serves as an umbrella
for our consulting practices, and creates a setting for developing
ideas, methods, materials, and ourselves.
The Action Design network consists of experienced practitioners who have worked
with Action Design for several years. Members of the network join us as faculty in
our competence building programs and as colleagues in selected consulting
engagements.
Contact us
Or contact us via traditional methods:
Action Design
66 Amherst Road
Newton, MA 02468
Tel: (617) 499-0007
Fax: (617) 965-7863
|
|